Resumo
Neste artigo, são analisados os objetos de estudo das principais pesquisas sobre ciência cidadã publicadas nos últimos cinco anos. Realizou-se uma busca na base de dados internacional Web of Science por artigos científicos publicados nos anos de 2016 a 2020 e com um número mínimo de 40 citações. Foram encontrados 31 artigos científicos internacionais que tratam de conceitos teóricos, aplicações e contribuições da Ciência Cidadã, abordam implicações éticas e sociais no recrutamento dos voluntários e a motivação desses cidadãos não cientistas para participarem de projetos de Ciência Cidadã e, ainda, avaliam a qualidade dos dados coletados. A pesquisa realizada pode contribuir para a academia, servir de base teórica para o tema da Ciência Cidadã e ser motivante para que os docentes conheçam e se utilizem de iniciativas nos diversos campos do conhecimento como abordagem no processo de ensino e aprendizagem.
Palavras-chave: Ciência cidadã. Participação. Não cientistas.
Overview of main studies on citizen science
Abstract
This article analyzes the objects of study of the main researches on citizen science published in the last five years. A search was made in the international Web of Science database for scientific articles published in the years 2016 to 2020 and with a minimum number of 40 citations. Thirty-one international scientific articles were obtained that deal with the theoretical concepts, applications and contributions of citizen science. They also address the ethical and social implications of recruiting volunteers and the motivation of these non-scientist citizens to participate in citizen science projects, and also assess the quality of the data collected. The research carried out can contribute to the academy, serving as a theoretical basis on the theme of citizen science and be motivating for teachers to know and use citizen science initiatives in different fields of knowledge as an approach in the teaching-learning process.
Keywords: Citizen Science. Participation. Non-scientist.
Referências
ABBOTT, B. W. et al. Trends and seasonality of river nutrients in agricultural catchments: 18 years of weekly citizen science in France. Science of the Total Environment, Amsterdam v. 624, p. 845-858, 2018.
AETRAPP. Monitoramento cidadão de focos de mosquitos Aedes, transmissores de dengue, zika, chikungunya e febre amarela urbana. Comunidades gerando dados para o combate aos mosquitos. Disponível em: https://www.aetrapp.org/. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2020.
AMANO, T.; LAMMING, J. D. L.; SUTHERLAND, W. J. Spatial gaps in global biodiversity information and the role of citizen science. BioScience, Oxford, v. 66, n. 5, p. 393-400, 2016.
AUSUBEL, D. The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1963.
BALLARD, H. L. et al. Contributions to conservation outcomes by natural history museum-led citizen science: examining evidence and next steps. Biological Conservation, Essex, v. 208, p. 87-97, 2017.
BALLARD, H. L.; DIXON, C. G. H.; HARRIS, E. M. Youth-focused citizen science: examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation. Biological Conservation, Essex, v. 208, p. 65-75, 2017.
BERTIN, P. R. B. a parceria para governo aberto como plataforma para o avanço da ciência aberta no Brasil. Transinformação, Campinas, v. 31, e190020, 2019.
BONNEY, R. Citizen science: a lab tradition. Living Bird, Nova York, v. 15, p. 7-15, 1996.
BONNEY, R. et al. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, Oxford, v. 59, n. 1, p. 977-984, 2009.
BONNEY, R. et al. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, New York, v. 25, p. 2-16, 2016.
BROEDER, D. et al. Citizen science for public health. Health Promotion Internacional, London, v. 33, n. 3, p. 505-514, 2018.
BRYDES DO BRASIL. Programa de pesquisa participativa. Disponível em: http://www.brydesdobrasil.com.br/. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2020.
BURGESS, H. K. et al. The science of citizen science: exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool. Biological Conservation, Essex, v. 208, p. 113-120, 2017.
CAPPA, F.; LAUT, J.; NOV, O.; GIUSTINIANO, L.; PORFIRI, M. Activating social strategies: face-to-face interaction in technology-mediated citizen science. Journal of Environmental Management, London, v.182, p. 374-384, 2016.
CASTRO, Y. B. et al. Solução tecnológica para promover a ciência cidadã no mapeamento de áreas cafeeiras em Minas Gerais. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE SENSORIAMENTO REMOTO, 2017, Santos. Anais [...]. Santos, 2017, p. 5636-5643.
CHANDLER, M. et al. Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biological Conservation, Essex, v. 213, p. 280-294, 2017.
CITIZEN SENSE. Air Quality Egg and the Makers. 2013. Disponível em: https://citizensense.net/air-quality-egg/. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2020.
CLÍNIO, A. Ciência aberta na América Latina: duas perspectivas em disputa. Transinformação, Campinas, v. 31, 2019.
COHN, J. P. Citizen science: can volunteers do real research? BioScience, Oxford, v. 58, n. 3, p. 192-197, 2008.
D’AMBRÓSIO, U. Etnomatemática: elo entre as tradições e a modernidade. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2001.
DICKINSON, J.; ZUCKERBERG, B.; BONTER, D. Citizen science as anecological research tool. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, Palo Alto, v. 41, n. 1, p. 149-172, 2010.
DOMITE, M. C. S. Quando a etnomatemática entra em ação. Scientific American Brasil - Etnomatemática, São Paulo, n. 11, p. 80-84, 2005.
DOMROESE, M. C.; JOHNSON, E. A. Why watch bees? motivations of citizen science volunteers in the great pollinator project. Biological Conservation, Essex, v. 208, p. 40-47, 2017.
ECOA. Disponível em: https://ecoa.org.br/ecoa-institucional/. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2020.
EGLASH, R. Fractais Africanos. Scientific American Brasil–Etnomatemática, São Paulo, n. 11, p. 66-67, 2005.
EXOSS CITIZEN SCIENCE PROJECT. Monitoramento de meteoros. Disponível em: http://press.exoss.org/projetos/. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2020.
GELDMAN, J. et al. What determines spatial bias in citizen science? exploring four recording schemes with different proficiency requirements. Diversity and Distributions, Cambridge, v. 22, p. 1139-1149, 2016.
GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002.
GREENEMEIER, L. Scientists scanning our solar system need your help to find asteroids for the exploration of their mineral properties. Scientific American, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.scientificamerican.com/citizen-science/zooniverse-asteroid-zoo/. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2020.
HAYOOD, B. K.; PARRISH, J. K.; DOLLIVER, J. Place-based and data-rich citizen science as a precursor for conservation action. Conservation Biology, Nova York, v. 30, n. 3, p. 476-486, 2016.
IRWIN, A. Citizen science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development. London and NewYork: Routledge, 1995.
JASANOFF, S. Tecnologias da humildade participação cidadã na governança da ciência. Sociedade e Estado, Brasília, v. 34, n. 2, 2019.
JERRETT, M. et al. Validating novel air pollution sensors to improve exposure estimates for epidemiological analyses and citizen science. Environmental Research, Elsevier, Amsterdam, v. 158, p. 286-294, 2017.
JOHNSTON, A. et al. Estimates of observer expertise improve species distributions from citizen science data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, London, v. 9, n. 1, p. 88-97, 2018.
KAMP, J. et al. Unstructured citizen science data fail to detect long-term population declines of common birds in Denmark. Diversity and Distributions, Cambridge, v. 22, p. 1024-1035, 2016.
KOBORI, H. et al. Citizen science: a new approach to advance ecology, education, and conservation. Ecological Research, Kyoto, v. 31, n. 1, p. 1-19, 2016.
KOSMALA, M. et al. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Whashington, DC, v. 14, n. 1, p. 551-560, 2016.
KULLENBERG, C.; KASPEROWSKI, D. What is citizen science? ascientometricmeta-analysis. PlosOne, San Francisco, v. 11, n. 1, 2016.
LAND-ZANDSTRA, A. M. et al. Citizen science on a smartphone: participants motivations and learning. Public Understanding of Science, New York, v. 25, n. 1, p. 45-60, 2016.
LE COZ, J. et al. Crowdsourced data for flood hydrology: feedback from recent citizen science projects in Argentina, France and New Zealand. Journal of Hydrology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, v. 541, p. 766-777, 2016.
LOPES, N. P. G. Ciência cidadã. Disponível em: http://professor.ufabc.edu.br/~natalia.lopes/cienciacidada/. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2020.
MAISTRELLO, L. et al. Citizen science and early detection of invasive species: phenology of first occurrences of Halyomorphahalys in southerneurope. Biological Invasions, Berkeley, v. 18, n. 11, p. 3109-3116, 2016.
McDONALD, D. et al. American gut: an open platform for citizen science microbiome Research. mSystems, Rockville, v. 3, n. 3, p. 1-28, 2018.
MCKINLEY, D. C. et al. Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation, Essex v. 208, p. 15-28, 2017.
MORE, A. et al. SPACE WARPS-II. New gravitational lens candidates from the CFHTLS discovered through citizen science. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Oxford, v. 455, n. 2, 2016.
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. Cooperative Observer Program (COOP). Disponível em: https://www.weather.gov/coop/overview. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2020.
NELMS, S. E. et al. Marine anthropogenic litter on british beaches: 10-year nationwide assessment using citizen science data. Science of the Total Environment, Amsterdam v. 579, p. 1399-1409, 2017.
PALMA, D. A. Monitoramento de qualidade da água com o enfoque ciência cidadã: estudo de cem Brazilândia. 2016. 76 p. Monografia (Projeto Final) - Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2016.
PALMER, J. R. B. et al. Citizen science provides a reliable and scalable tool to track disease-carrying mosquitoes. Nature Communications, London, v. 8, n. 916, 2017.
POCOCK, M. J. et al. The diversity and evolution of ecological and environmental citizen science. PlosOne, San Francisco, v. 12, n. 4, p. e0172579, 2017.
PONCIANO, L. Estímulo à curiosidade e envolvimento com a pesquisa científica: comunidade é chamada a participar de projetos científicos pela PUC-Minas. Estado de Minas Educação, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.em.com.br/app/noticia/especiais/educacao/2019/07/29/internas_educacao,1073208/envolvimento-com-pesquisa.shtml. Acesso em: 24 mar. 2020.
REBOUCAS, F. Ciência cidadã– Pensegreen. Gazeta Brazilian News, 2013. Disponível em: http://gazetanews.com/ciencia-cidada-pense-green/. Acesso em: 12 jun. 2020.
SAVE BRASIL. Sociedade para a conservação das aves do Brasil. Disponível em: http://savebrasil.org.br/cidadao-cientista-1. Acesso em: 27 mar. 2020.
SCHULTZ, C. B. et al. Citizen science monitoring demonstrates dramatic declines of monarch butterflies in western north America. Biological Conservation, Essex, v. 214, p.343-346, 2017.
SEE, L. et al. Crowdsourcing, citizen science or volunteered geographic information? the current state of crowdsourced geographic information. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-information, Basel, v. 5, n. 5, 2016.
SISTEMA DE INFORMAÇÃO SOBRE A BIODIVERSIDADE BRASILEIRA. SIBBR. Disponível em: https://www.sibbr.gov.br/cienciacidada/projetos.html. Acesso em: 23 mar. 2020.
SOARES, M. D.; SANTOS, R. D. C. Ciência cidadã: o envolvimento popular em atividades científicas. Revista Ciência Hoje, São Paulo, v. 47, p. 38-43, 2011.
SOCIENTIZE. Project Socientizeannounces white paper on citizen science at their final conference, 2014. Disponível em:https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=pt-BR&sl=en&u=https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/project-socientize-announces-white-paper-citizen-science-their-final-conference&prev=search. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2020.
STEWART, I. Mosaicos e origami. Scientific American Brasil–Etnomatemática, São Paulo, n. 11, p. 78-79, 2005.
SWANSON, A. et al. A generalized approach for producing, quantifying, and validating citizen science data from wildlife images. Conservation Biology, New York, 30, n. 3, p. 520-531, 2016.
WILDSCHUT, D. The need for citizen science in the transition to a sustainable peer-to-peer-society. Futures, San Francisco, v. 91, p. 46-52, 2017.
WOOLLEY, J. P. et al. Citizen science or scientific citizenship? disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives. BMC Medical Ethics, London, v.17, n. 33, 2016.
ZEVIN, M. et al. Gravity Spy: Integrating advanced LIGO detector characterization, machine learning, and citizen science. Classical and Quantum Gravity, Cambridge, v.1, 2016.
Este trabalho está licensiado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Array